top of page
Writer's pictureNick Praulins

Why Resilience Mapping Could Be a Game-Changer for Schools. Part 1.

Updated: Nov 25

Could resilience mapping be the key to unlocking a stronger, more adaptable school?

Recently, a friend shared a thought-provoking Instagram post by Hyper Island, a Stockholm-based learning institute known for developing innovative leaders in the corporate and startup world. Their tagline -“Get ready for the unknown” - feels especially fitting in our current, tumultuous “here and now.” In this post, they had shared their predictions for key skills that leaders will need in 2025, and one concept - resilience mapping - really caught my attention. Hyper Island’s insights, often rooted in forward-thinking approaches to adaptability, sparked a new question for me:


Could resilience mapping help school leaders tackle the unique and constant challenges in education?


As educators, we know the landscape is full of surprises. Funding issues, policy shifts, staff well-being, and even the lives our students lead outside of school create daily ripple effects. This is where the potential of resilience mapping comes in. A proactive approach that helps leaders identify potential stress points, leverage strengths, and engage the broader school community to build a foundation for stability and well-being.


Let’s explore how resilience mapping might be applied in a K-12 school context.


What Exactly is Resilience Mapping?


Resilience mapping is a process that allows leaders to anticipate challenges and develop adaptive strategies to handle them effectively. By examining areas of vulnerability and existing strengths, resilience mapping helps school leaders create a framework for responding to issues with greater confidence and agility. It’s a bit like having a roadmap to manage the unexpected, guiding schools through potential disruptions without losing sight of their priorities.


Planning for the Unpredictable


  1. Staying Steady in Crisis: schools face a range of unpredictable hurdles, from budget constraints and policy shifts to sudden staff shortages. Resilience mapping helps leaders anticipate these challenges and build a thoughtful framework to respond effectively.


    Rather than being caught off guard, you can stay one step ahead, keeping learning uninterrupted and the school community supported.


  2. Student Success Beyond the Classroom: a successful student experience extends far beyond test scores; it’s about creating a stable and nurturing environment where kids can thrive in every way. Resilience mapping helps school leaders identify areas where students might face struggles - socially, emotionally, and academically. This process could help uncover students perceptions about confidence, problem-solving, support networks, and their school experience (sense of belonging and engagement) giving them a truly participatory voice in their school.


  3. Supporting the Heart of the School: Your Staff: teachers and school staff are essential to everything a school accomplishes, but their well-being is often stretched thin. Through resilience mapping, school leaders can pinpoint stressors - workload imbalances, unclear communication channels, or support gaps - that impact staff morale.


    What if you could identify and address these issues before they lead to burnout?


Resilience Mapping vs. Crisis Management: What’s the Difference?


It’s natural to wonder: Isn’t resilience mapping just another form of crisis management or policy planning? While there’s overlap, resilience mapping takes a unique, proactive approach that emphasises visualising connections, dependencies, and areas of vulnerability across the school ecosystem in a way that traditional crisis management often doesn’t.


So, where does the “mapping” part come in?


In resilience mapping, the goal is to create a dynamic, often visual representation of how various challenges might impact interconnected aspects of the school environment - teaching, well-being, operations, communication, and resources. Mapping doesn’t just help in planning for isolated incidents but rather in understanding how challenges in one area might affect others. Here’s how it differs:


  1. Interconnectedness and Visualisation: Traditional crisis management often involves isolated policies and procedures for specific situations. Resilience mapping, however, provides a “map” or visual guide to see how a staff shortage, for example, could ripple into student well-being or impact classroom coverage. By mapping out these connections, school leaders can anticipate secondary impacts and develop more adaptive, integrated responses.


  2. Ongoing Adaptability: While crisis management policies are often static, resilience mapping encourages an ongoing review and adaptation as new challenges emerge. Regular feedback loops allow leaders to adjust their “maps” based on real-time information and changing circumstances, keeping the school community more resilient overall.


  3. Strengths-Based and Preventive: Resilience mapping emphasises identifying and building on current strengths within the school, such as support systems or strong staff morale, to prevent issues before they happen. Instead of waiting for a crisis to strike, leaders proactively map out areas of strength and vulnerability, creating a foundation that allows for a quicker, more confident response to future challenges.


  4. Team Engagement and Ownership: In resilience mapping, input from a diverse team - including teachers, staff, parents, and even students - is central to understanding potential challenges and strengths. This collective approach encourages shared ownership, making resilience mapping a more collaborative process than traditional, top-down crisis planning.


Crisis Management

Resilience Mapping

Focus

reactive policies

proactive interconnections

Approach

specific incident responses

system-wide impact and dependencies

Adaptability

static policies

ongoing review and feedback loops

Engagement

top-down planning

collaborative, team-based input



By focusing on interconnectedness, adaptability, strengths, and community-wide engagement, resilience mapping goes beyond crisis management to create a resilient culture that can handle change with agility and foresight.


Potential Challenges in Implementation


While resilience mapping offers significant benefits, implementing it may pose some challenges. Limited resources, time constraints, or initial resistance from staff and parents could be hurdles. To overcome these, start small - introduce resilience mapping to a pilot group or in one area of the school’s operation. By demonstrating its positive impact on school culture and student support, you can build buy-in gradually and expand the process over time.


The Takeaway


Resilience mapping has the potential to give school leaders a powerful, proactive approach to navigating the unexpected. By identifying challenges, leveraging resources, and engaging every part of the school community, you lay the groundwork for a school environment where students feel safe, staff feel supported, and parents feel engaged. Resilience mapping isn’t just a strategy - it’s an essential commitment to a school’s long-term stability and growth.


Could resilience mapping be the key to building stronger, more adaptable schools in the future? It’s certainly worth exploring.


More to Come


In Part 2 of this article, we will explore some concrete examples of what resilient mapping could look like in schools, what what tools we might need to help us in the process.

Recent Posts

See All

Comments


bottom of page